|
1 | 1 | # Modeling with Stochasticity
|
2 | 2 |
|
3 |
| -All models with `ODESystem` are deterministic. `SDESystem` adds another element |
4 |
| -to the model: randomness. This is a |
| 3 | +All previous differential equations tutorials deal with deterministic `ODESystem`s. |
| 4 | +In this tutorial, we add randomness. |
| 5 | +In particular, we show how to represent a |
5 | 6 | [stochastic differential equation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_differential_equation)
|
6 |
| -which has a deterministic (drift) component and a stochastic (diffusion) |
7 |
| -component. Let's take the Lorenz equation from the first tutorial and extend |
8 |
| -it to have multiplicative noise by creating `@brownian` variables in the equations. |
| 7 | +as a `SDESystem`. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +!!! note |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | + The high level `@mtkmodel` macro used in the |
| 12 | + [getting started tutorial](@ref getting_started) |
| 13 | + is not yet compatible with `SDESystem`. |
| 14 | + We thus have to use a lower level interface to define stochastic differential equations. |
| 15 | + For an introduction to this interface, read the |
| 16 | + [programmatically generating ODESystems tutorial](@ref programmatically). |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +Let's take the Lorenz equation and add noise to each of the states. |
| 19 | +To show the flexibility of ModelingToolkit, |
| 20 | +we do not use homogeneous noise, with constant variance, |
| 21 | +but instead use heterogeneous noise, |
| 22 | +where the magnitude of the noise scales with (0.3 times) the magnitude of each of the states: |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +```math |
| 25 | +\begin{aligned} |
| 26 | +\frac{dx}{dt} &= (\sigma (y-x)) &+ 0.1x\frac{dB}{dt} \\ |
| 27 | +\frac{dy}{dt} &= (x(\rho-z) - y) &+ 0.1y\frac{dB}{dt} \\ |
| 28 | +\frac{dz}{dt} &= (xy - \beta z) &+ 0.1z\frac{dB}{dt} \\ |
| 29 | +\end{aligned} |
| 30 | +``` |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +Where $B$, is standard Brownian motion, also called the |
| 33 | +[Wiener process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiener_process). |
| 34 | +We use notation similar to the |
| 35 | +[Langevin equation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_differential_equation#Use_in_physics), |
| 36 | +often used in physics. |
| 37 | +By "multiplying" the equations by $dt$, the notation used in |
| 38 | +[probability theory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_differential_equation#Use_in_probability_and_mathematical_finance) |
| 39 | +can be recovered. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +We use this Langevin-like notation because it allows us to extend MTK modeling capacity from ODEs to SDEs, |
| 42 | +using only a single new concept, `@brownian` variables, which represent $\frac{dB}{dt}$ in the above equation. |
9 | 43 |
|
10 | 44 | ```@example SDE
|
11 | 45 | using ModelingToolkit, StochasticDiffEq
|
12 | 46 | using ModelingToolkit: t_nounits as t, D_nounits as D
|
| 47 | +using Plots |
13 | 48 |
|
14 |
| -# Define some variables |
15 |
| -@parameters σ ρ β |
16 |
| -@variables x(t) y(t) z(t) |
17 |
| -@brownian a |
18 |
| -eqs = [D(x) ~ σ * (y - x) + 0.1a * x, |
19 |
| - D(y) ~ x * (ρ - z) - y + 0.1a * y, |
20 |
| - D(z) ~ x * y - β * z + 0.1a * z] |
| 49 | +@parameters σ=10.0 ρ=2.33 β=26.0 |
| 50 | +@variables x(t)=5.0 y(t)=5.0 z(t)=1.0 |
| 51 | +@brownian B |
| 52 | +eqs = [D(x) ~ σ * (y - x) + 0.3x * B, |
| 53 | + D(y) ~ x * (ρ - z) - y + 0.3y * B, |
| 54 | + D(z) ~ x * y - β * z + 0.3z * B] |
21 | 55 |
|
22 | 56 | @mtkbuild de = System(eqs, t)
|
| 57 | +``` |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +Even though we did not explicitly use `SDESystem`, ModelingToolkit can still infer this from the equations. |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +```@example SDE |
| 62 | +typeof(de) |
| 63 | +``` |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +We continue by solving and plotting the SDE. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +```@example SDE |
| 68 | +prob = SDEProblem(de, [], (0.0, 100.0), []) |
| 69 | +sol = solve(prob, SRIW1()) |
| 70 | +plot(sol, idxs = [(1, 2, 3)]) |
| 71 | +``` |
23 | 72 |
|
24 |
| -u0map = [ |
25 |
| - x => 1.0, |
26 |
| - y => 0.0, |
27 |
| - z => 0.0 |
28 |
| -] |
| 73 | +The noise present in all 3 equations is correlated, as can be seen on the below figure. |
| 74 | +The figure also shows the multiplicative nature of the noise. |
| 75 | +Because states `x` and `y` generally take on larger values, |
| 76 | +the noise also takes on a more pronounced effect on these states compared to the state `z`. |
29 | 77 |
|
30 |
| -parammap = [ |
31 |
| - σ => 10.0, |
32 |
| - β => 26.0, |
33 |
| - ρ => 2.33 |
34 |
| -] |
| 78 | +```@example SDE |
| 79 | +plot(sol) |
| 80 | +``` |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +If you want uncorrelated noise for each equation, |
| 83 | +multiple `@brownian` variables have to be declared. |
35 | 84 |
|
36 |
| -prob = SDEProblem(de, u0map, (0.0, 100.0), parammap) |
37 |
| -sol = solve(prob, LambaEulerHeun()) |
| 85 | +```@example SDE |
| 86 | +@brownian Bx By Bz |
| 87 | +eqs = [D(x) ~ σ * (y - x) + 0.3x * Bx, |
| 88 | + D(y) ~ x * (ρ - z) - y + 0.3y * By, |
| 89 | + D(z) ~ x * y - β * z + 0.3z * Bz] |
| 90 | +@mtkbuild de = System(eqs, t) |
| 91 | +prob = SDEProblem(de, [], (0.0, 100.0), []) |
| 92 | +sol = solve(prob, SRIW1()) |
| 93 | +plot(sol) |
38 | 94 | ```
|
0 commit comments