Data Type of applied_rule_ids in Quote and Quote Item is different

[senthilengg]

Preconditions and environment

• Issue on 2.4.7 & 2.4.8
• Quote table applied rule ids will mis match with quoteItem if 100+ rules applied to the same item. Also its better to be consistent across parent and child there is no reason to have text in quote_item and varchar(255) in quote

Steps to reproduce

• Just check the db_schema.xml in Quote module

Expected result

• Data type should be consistent across parent and child tables

Actual result

• Data type of Quote Item applied_rule_ids column is inconsistent compare to applied_rule_ids in quote table

Additional information

No response

Release note

No response

Triage and priority

• Severity: S0 - Affects critical data or functionality and leaves users without workaround.
• Severity: S1 - Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
• Severity: S2 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
• Severity: S3 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
• Severity: S4 - Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.

[m2-assistant]

Hi @senthilengg. Thank you for your report.
To speed up processing of this issue, make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce.

• For more details, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.
• Add a comment to assign the issue: @magento I am working on this
• To learn more about issue processing workflow, refer to the Code Contributions.

---

Join Magento Community Engineering Slack and ask your questions in #github channel.
⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all issues must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.
🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.
📞 The triage of issues happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

[m2-assistant]

Hi @engcom-Hotel. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

• 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).
• 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue.
• 3. Add Area: XXXXX label to the ticket, indicating the functional areas it may be related to.
• 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch
  Details

  - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
  - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!
• 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
• 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

[engcom-Hotel]

Hello @senthilengg,

Thanks for the report and collaboration!

We have tried to reproduce this issue in the latest 2.4-develop branch as well as 2.4.8 version by looking into describing the table definition as below:

Due to this, if we have 100+ rules applied on a product may produce weird behaviour. Hence confirming the issue.

Thanks

[github-jira-sync-bot]

✅ Jira issue https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/AC-14518 is successfully created for this GitHub issue.

[m2-assistant]

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Hotel. Thank you for verifying the issue.
Issue Available: @engcom-Hotel, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.