Optimized RVV_ZVL256B Implementation of zgemv_n #5245
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The implementation of zgemv_n using RVV_ZVL256B has been optimized. Compared to the previous implementation, it has achieved a 1.5x performance improvement.
|
The check related to C910v has timed out. I don't know why this happened. Maybe it should be restarted. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The implementation of zgemv_n using RVV_ZVL256B has been optimized. Compared to the previous implementation, it has achieved a 1.5x performance improvement. And the modified code has a 2.4x speedup compared to the version without RVV.