-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
Add a suffix to the script file to avoid conflict with library name #3647
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
yadavan88
wants to merge
3
commits into
VirtusLab:main
Choose a base branch
from
yadavan88:worksheet_name_change
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We were also thinking about adding a random suffix, but that would make it impossible to run the main class by name. So instead we did a named that should not interfere with any library. This might be breaking so we also wanted to have a fallback to add the suffix if someone is using the old one. @Gedochao any idea where that can be?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for getting back late.
As for inferring main classes, detecting script main classes and such, the logic is here:
scala-cli/modules/build/src/main/scala/scala/build/Build.scala
Lines 115 to 183 in a4c286f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
However, I am not convinced we should change the wrapper name - not without explicit configuration, at least.
Maybe via directive/flag.
Changing the default behaviour will be an effective change of syntax, not just for inferring the main class name.
i.e. code like this will stop working:
https://gist.github.com/Gedochao/8902375ad97d24d8ed49c9bb33d5bd08
And this feels quite bad to me, since we've had this syntax since forever.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe something like:
//> using script.overrideWrapperName <name>
?
So that the change of wrapper is committed in the code, to make the changed behaviour predictable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As for better UX, we could think about detecting the cases such as the reproduction from #3595, and then print a warning, suggesting to override the wrapper... Although detecting such a case would likely mean parsing AST, so that's a tougher cookie.