Skip to content

Pmolloy/rockchip boot modes #30

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pamolloy
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@pamolloy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@felixsinger figured you might find this interesting. Also would be interesting to look at some other boards/chips to see if they behave the same.

Copy link
Member

@orangecms orangecms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd rather like to put this in https://github.com/platform-system-interface/rk_boot and keep psi-spec on a higher level. WDYT?

@pamolloy
Copy link
Contributor Author

pamolloy commented Apr 29, 2025

I would really love to see a single place that documents boot ROMs across vendors work rather than having to dig into vendor specific tooling and documentation. Not only does it provide documentation for boot loader developers, but also users. Ideally it could help inform people which chip to purchase, if the ROM has more and better functionality.

This particular Rockchip information isn't specific to a single tool. In fact it doesn't need to be tied to a tool at all. For example, it would be a good thing to link to from board documentation for users to explain what a button or header does.

I've already put this in my boot chain distribution documentation so I'm not too concerned about where it ends up here. I thought this was a place to document boot ROMs, but of course it doesn't need to be.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants