Refactor type guards in Agent class to use TypeIs instead of TypeGuard #1637
+5
−5
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In most cases,
TypeIs
is preferred overTypeGuard
asTypeGuard
fails to narrow in the negative case. A simple example is howisawaitable
use to work, where the negative case would wouldn't narrow the object at all keeping it unioned it withAwaitable
.