Skip to content

fix(lexicons): fix issue where invalid TypedUnion<> type is generated when refs == [] #89

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2025

Conversation

shuuji3
Copy link
Collaborator

@shuuji3 shuuji3 commented Apr 25, 2025

This fixes the invalid type generation encountered in #74.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 25, 2025

Deploy Preview for tsky ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f5936ce
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/tsky/deploys/680b02fdc5a7890008b84bf5
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-89--tsky.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report for ./packages/client/

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 13.64% 52 / 381
🔵 Statements 13.13% 52 / 396
🔵 Functions 9.6% 17 / 177
🔵 Branches 14.45% 12 / 83
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #247 for commit f5936ce by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Apr 25, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/tsky-dev/tsky/@tsky/client@89

commit: f5936ce

@shuuji3 shuuji3 merged commit bdd2c9c into main Apr 25, 2025
9 checks passed
@shuuji3 shuuji3 deleted the shuuji3/fix/empty-union-in-lexicon branch April 25, 2025 03:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant